The welfare of the child is paramount

Understanding Child Arrangements in the UK: Mediation vs Court, PSOs, and How to Protect Your Child

  • In England and Wales, the focus is on the welfare of the child. Since 2014, terms like child arrangements replace the old “custody” language.
  • A Child Arrangements Order (CAO) determines where a child lives (residence) and who they see (contact). It can also cover other welfare issues and set rules about time with each parent.
  • Related orders in UK family law include Parental Responsibility (PR), Prohibited Steps Orders (PSO), and Specific Issue Orders.

Key terms you’ll see in UK family law

  • Parental Responsibility (PR): The legal rights, duties, and responsibilities a parent has for a child.
  • CAO (Child Arrangements Order): Court order about residence and contact, and sometimes other welfare matters.
  • PSO (Prohibited Steps Order): A court order preventing a parent from taking a specific step in relation to the child without the other parent’s consent or court permission.
  • Specific Issue Order: A court order about a particular question concerning the child (e.g., school choice).
  • MIAM (Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting): A briefing session to explore mediation before starting court proceedings.
  • Mediation: A process where a trained mediator helps separated parents reach a voluntary, binding agreement.

Mediation vs going to court: pros and cons

  1. Mediation (including MIAMs)
  • What it is: A collaborative process to reach a voluntary agreement about child arrangements and welfare.
  • Pros:
    • Often cheaper and faster than court.
    • Keeps control with you and your ex-partner, not a judge.
    • Supports child wellbeing by reducing conflict.
    • Agreements can be turned into legally binding orders later (CAO, PR, etc.).
    • More privacy and can preserve future co-parenting.
  • Cons:
    • Not legally binding unless formalised later.
    • Not suitable if there’s abuse, power imbalance, or high risk.
    • If no agreement, you may still need to go to court.
  1. Going to court (Family Court)
  • What it involves: Filing for a CAO or other welfare orders; a judge makes a legally binding decision.
  • Pros:
    • Legally enforceable and clear.
    • Useful when safety concerns, evidence gaps, or non-cooperation exist.
    • Can address serious issues (removal from the country, specific restrictions).
  • Cons:
    • More expensive and time-consuming.
    • Adversarial tone can strain parent-child relationships.
    • Less flexible; outcomes are court-decided.

Prohibited Steps Order (PSO): what it is, how to obtain it, and grounds

  • What is a PSO? A PSO stops a parent from taking a specific step about the child without the other parent’s consent or court permission.
  • When used: Often to prevent harm, potential abduction, or unilateral decisions (like moving the child abroad or changing schools) without consultation.
  • How to obtain one:
    • Apply via the family court, either as part of a broader case or as an interim measure.
    • Show a real need to prevent a specific action that could affect the child’s welfare.
    • The court assesses welfare, safety concerns, and urgency before deciding.
  • Grounds (typical reasons a PSO might be granted):
    • Preventing removal of the child from the jurisdiction (abduction risk).
    • Preventing actions that could harm the child’s welfare or safety before a full hearing.
    • Stopping major unilateral changes to arrangements (e.g., relocation or significant education changes) without consultation.
  • Consequences of breaching a PSO:
    • Contempt of court, which can mean fines or imprisonment.
    • Breach can affect ongoing proceedings and enforcement.
    • May lead to stricter court supervision or police involvement.
  • Practical note: PSOs are powerful and should be used only when there is genuine risk. Always seek legal advice to ensure appropriateness.

Why obtain a PSO or pursue court orders?

  • Protect a child from harm or risk.
  • Prevent unilateral, disruptive changes to routines or residence.
  • Address risk of parental child abduction.
  • Establish clear, enforceable arrangements when parents cannot agree.

Rationale for mediation: focus on child wellbeing and future co-parenting

  • Child wellbeing: Mediation emphasizes cooperation, which can be better for a child’s emotional health.
  • Long-term parenting: Mediation preserves the possibility of ongoing co-parenting without a winner/loser dynamic.
  • Cost and time: Mediation is typically cheaper and faster than court.
  • Compliance: Voluntary agreements formed through mediation often have higher adherence.

Practical tips for parents

  • Start with child welfare and how arrangements affect schooling, routines, and wellbeing.
  • Consider MIAM: Most people must attend a MIAM before court unless exempt.
  • Gather documents: School records, medical records, communications, and evidence of arrangements.
  • Seek legal advice: A family law solicitor or accredited mediator can tailor guidance to your situation.
  • Keep the child’s best interests at the center of discussions.

A brief glossary for SEO

  • CAO (Child Arrangements Order)
  • PR (Parental Responsibility)
  • PSO (Prohibited Steps Order)
  • MIAM (Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting)
  • Specific Issue Order
  • Mediation
  • Family Court UK
  • UK family law
  • Child welfare
  • Parental rights
  • Child abduction prevention
  • Co-parenting

Final note
This overview isn’t legal advice. UK family law is nuanced, and outcomes depend on your case specifics. If you’re facing a child arrangements dispute, consult a qualified family law solicitor or accredited mediator like me to understand your options.